From 5a4e62513f5ff443dccbe02b7a619dae61e70c50 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Elliott Hughes <enh@google.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 22:16:19 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] crash_dump: suggest lldbclient.py rather than gdbclient.py.

They're the same script right now, but gdbclient.py is a bit misleading,
even if we're not likely to ever actually remove it.

Test: treehugger
Change-Id: Ic514f98bf13b3e699be4dbad2bafef22d41d9ffd
---
 debuggerd/crash_dump.cpp | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/debuggerd/crash_dump.cpp b/debuggerd/crash_dump.cpp
index cbb118151..442392d30 100644
--- a/debuggerd/crash_dump.cpp
+++ b/debuggerd/crash_dump.cpp
@@ -665,7 +665,7 @@ int main(int argc, char** argv) {
         "* Process %d has been suspended while crashing.\n"
         "* To attach the debugger, run this on the host:\n"
         "*\n"
-        "*     gdbclient.py -p %d\n"
+        "*     lldbclient.py -p %d\n"
         "*\n"
         "***********************************************************",
         target_process, target_process);