Dependencies of libbinder, so we can build
a core libbinder library, libbinder_sdk.
This is preparing the way to move this part of libbinder
together with binder code into a single project.
Bug: 302720583
Change-Id: Icff078ac6e36c7f2b91cf815d5b9ed19b2e706e1
Surprised this isn't breaking anything, so wanted to
make sure it worked.
Bug: 232557259
Test: libutils_test
Change-Id: Iaec47d644c02dc190e397c6f84dcfab4cc76f566
Before, we only did this in sp<> constructors, but we can always make
this check during the initial incStrong.
Since prebuilts call into the existing report race function declared
in StrongPointer.h, we still call this function from RefBase.cpp.
Bug: 232557259
Test: libutils_test
Change-Id: I4080b1869b83ecf655fc9c182b6de768a6358adf
Make it easier to see reference to usage documentation, as requested in
review.
Bug: 184190315
Test: libutils_test
Change-Id: If9056e35b1c7a779dd78f2b986ad10d02f25eaf3
Previously, sp::sp(T*) internally had a static cast, and people
frequently wrote code like this:
sp<A> a = ...;
sp<B> b(a.get()); // implicit static cast
Luckily, none of the other sp constructors have this implicit cast. So,
for explicit code, rather than making those use static_cast internally,
adding an sp::cast function.
Bug: 184190315
Test: use in libbinder
Change-Id: Id205c88d03e16cf85ccb8f493ce88b4bbc65a688
In form, inspired by ANDROID_BASE_UNIQUE_FD_DISABLE_IMPLICIT_CONVERSION.
We get occasional bugs about sp double-ownership. When this flag is
enabled, we have:
- you must construct RefBase objects using sp<>::make
- you must construct wp<> objects by converting them to sp<>
- if you want to convert a raw pointer to an sp<> object (this is
possible since the refcount is used internally, and is used commonly
on this*), then you must use 'assertStrongRefExists' semantics which
aborts if there is no strong ref held. That is, if a client uses
std::make_shared and then calls a function which internally used to
call `sp<T>(this)`, you would now call
`sp<T>::assertStrongRefExists(this)`, and the double ownership
problem would become a runtime error.
Bug: 184190315
Test: libutils_test
Change-Id: Ie18d3146420df1808e3733027070ec234dda4e9d
This is in preparation of doing what we did for SharedRefBase (hiding
operator new) so that clients can't accidentally construct
shared_ptr/unique_ptr or any other alternative memory management scheme
which would conflict with RefBase. You can see what ultimately happened
to SharedRefBase in frameworks/native CL
10d9ddf2e3da3ba3a425fb8396aaaec728e5fbdb.
The goal for this:
- promote use of 'sp<T>::make' over 'sp<T> .. = new T'
- make 'operator new' a private member of RefBase
Bug: 138956784
Test: libutils_test
Change-Id: I47f4d28edbf7534730c7b6fb1de748dd60f34e11
Perhaps the better question is, why have I 100s of times, typed
"ASSERT_NE(nullptr, foo)" for sp<> foo, and got a compiler error and
then change it to "foo.get()". This CL so we can stop wasting cycles
with that error.
Fixes: 147842528
Test: libutils_test
Change-Id: Id63b29d2a1ff3077201a62b69d864c5a826c47e0
For the raw pointer constructor, check that the argument is not on the
stack. Passing a stack pointer as an sp<> parameter is dangerous,
since we will attempt to deallocate the object once the sp<> is no
longer needed. We approximate ste stack ccheck by testing whether it
is on the same page as the frame pointer.
Do the same for raw pointer assignment.
Bug: 138956784
Test: Boot AOSP
Change-Id: I2c2405be443389af7e6a713aadcb3ee1f372a85e
Fix wp and sp comparison bugs
Make clear() actually clear wp m_refs, so that nulls compare equal.
Make equality consistent with < and >, ensuring that a weak pointer
cannot be both equal to and greater than another.
Don't rely on the built-in < and > operators to correctly order
different objects. The standard does not guarantee that, and there is
a risk of compiler relying on that lack of guarantee.
Remove unnecessary comparison overloads, especially those
comparing a wp<> to an sp<>.
Change the remaining wp<> to sp<> comparisons to check for equivalence
of the mRefs pointer instead of the object address, thus eliminating
the dubious equal comparison result for a dead wp<> and an sp<> that
happen to point to the same object address.
Add comparison tests.
This reverts commit a2a2ad8057.
The original code, and my original CL, both failed to initialize m_refs
in various wp<> constructors. This now became more important, since
comparisons now rely more on m_refs. However I believe it was always
a bug, since some comparisons always relied on m_refs.
Test: Treehugger, boot AOSP, atest RefBase
Bug: 126922090
This reverts commit a2a2ad8057.
Reason for revert: Reapply after constructor fixes.
Change-Id: I2c8917416a2306e36d2b6bb7b397f653020e5688
This reverts commit 029b12ebde.
Reason for revert: There appear to be problems with null comparisons. Reported failure in HwcBufferCacheTest.
Change-Id: I19745bb281dabe8b05c2df3fe95e7be7a49dcd51
Make clear() actually clear wp m_refs, so that nulls compare equal.
Make equality consistent with < and >, ensuring that a weak pointer
cannot be both equal to and greater than another.
Don't rely on the built-in < and > operators to correctly order
different objects. The standard does not guarantee that, and there is
a risk of compiler relying on that lack of guarantee.
Remove unnecessary comparison overloads, especially those
comparing a wp<> to an sp<>.
Change the remaining wp<> to sp<> comparisons to check for equivalence
of the mRefs pointer instead of the object address, thus eliminating
the dubious equal comparison result for a dead wp<> and an sp<> that
happen to point to the same object address.
Add comparison tests.
Test: Treehugger, boot AOSP, atest RefBase
Bug: 126922090
Change-Id: I15911150e0fc85ace2c4b77d337826e12793c690
sp<>::clear() presents the same risks of heap corruption in the presence
of data races as does assignment. Add the same data race check.
Bug: 112651574
Test: Build and boot AOSP
Change-Id: I75d4eedd756d521920e61ff9187509f9145d4235
Upcoming clang update to r328903 adds a new warning:
warning: extra ';' outside of a function is incompatible with C++98
[-Wc++98-compat-extra-semi]
which is included in -Weverything.
We can just delete the extra semicolon (even though we use gnu99), and
save the extra byte.
Test: Build
Change-Id: I49b6e6af483e011632e6a34c0663c93e5c385aa6
Force assignment to read the old pointer value twice, and check
that it didn't change in the interim. Previous experience with
Skia suggests that this has a high probability of correctly detecting
a data race when it occurs, instead of potentially letting the
count associated with the old pointer value get decremented twice,
and corrupting the heap.
This does increase the size of sp assignments, which seem to
commonly get inlined. For the general case, we add a third
comparison and function call.
Some code reformatting to make this consistent with modern conventions
and pass automated checks.
Test: Booted aosp build. Ran libutils tests. Looked at generated code.
Bug: 31227650
Change-Id: Id93a05c6bf10f01ee15ff1bb409611f2058f988f
moved Foo.h as first include of Foo.cpp, and
removed redundant includes.
Made NativeHandle non virtual.
Test: run & compile
Bug: n/a
Change-Id: I37fa746cd42c9ba23aba181f84cb6c619386406a
Moved headers from include/libutils and include/libsysutils to
libutils/include and libsysutils/include respectively, so they can be
exported via these libs. They needed to be moved since Soong does
not allow export from external folder.
Added symlink from old locations. They are needed since Soong
includes system/core/include by default. Once all modules are
cleaned up to explicitly add the required libs, the symlinks will be
removed.
Moved headers of libutils to libutils_headers. They should be used
by modules for header-only inlines. Added libutils_headers as
dependency of libutils.
Split of C++ headers into those that have no dependency and those that
have dependency on libutils.so will be handled in a later CL.
Test: Add above libs to shared lib of local module
Change-Id: I122db72056b26b1f39bad1d9a0c2a1c5efda3550
2017-01-24 22:51:36 +00:00
Renamed from include/utils/StrongPointer.h (Browse further)
