String16's ctors already handle static strings, so we don't need a
specialized constructor which accepts StaticString16.
Bug: n/a
Test: libutils_test
Change-Id: I93a1ba70d743ff9c73f113d53ffba73cef6adade
String16 is still in use by AIDL compiler. Because String16 is not
noexcept-move-constructible, the C++ compiler will complain when it is
used with non-copyable types (such as ParcelFileDescriptor).
For example, when vector<Foo> is resized, copy-ctor of Foo is called,
which is not available.
parcelable Foo {
String s;
ParcelFileDescriptor[] pfds;
}
By providing noexcept move-ctor for String16, vector<Foo> can be resized
with no problem.
Btw, copy from StaticString16 is specialized for efficiency and move
from StaticString16 don't need to be different from copy.
Bug: 192136980
Test: libutils_test
Change-Id: I13744a2ceebf5781c3ef7f3a04237a6750b0db0a
Fixes a compiler warning for implicit conversion changes from signed
to unsigned which surfaced when refactoring native input libraries.
Add an explicit cast to avoid adding -Wno-sign-conversion compile
flags.
Test: b libsurfaceflinger_unittest
Bug: b/188792659
Change-Id: I1b9309c3530d6063d5cefcaa31af84d9cebc3f5d
Merged-In: I8866aef7f09ca5173604abe18c586b68bbf12ed6
Fixes a compiler warning for implicit conversion changes from signed
to unsigned which surfaced when refactoring native input libraries.
Add an explicit cast to avoid adding -Wno-sign-conversion compile
flags.
Test: b libsurfaceflinger_unittest
Change-Id: I8866aef7f09ca5173604abe18c586b68bbf12ed6
This function, ironically, is being removed.
Even more amusing, it was never "remove" anyway --- it literally did
the opposite, and removed everything *except* the range you passed to
it, and should probably have been called "keep"!
I'm looking at reimplementing much of libutils, but first I'm improving
test coverage, and literally every test I wrote for this failed. And
then when I fixed the "obvious bugs" in the implementation, I found
there actually were a couple of existing unit tests --- that mostly
served to demonstrate just how counter-intuitive this function was.
Bug: http://b/156999009
Test: treehugger
Change-Id: I41fd85f7c0988070f4039f607d2e57523d862ed9
These tests are only in internal right now, preventing me from removing
this function entirely. So let's get them out of the way...
Test: treehugger
Ignore-AOSP-First: workaround for presubmit merge conflict
Bug: http://b/35267372
Change-Id: Ib5de178ffad833c87e8e93bfd33e85a0ff504ac0
It's not tested, and it's not used. Also remove the fuzzer which is just
wasting CPU cycles.
This gets us to 100% function coverage, 100% line coverage, and N/A
branch coverage for StopWatch.
Test: treehugger
Change-Id: Ib5e08510ef1046a6f2af3f0b8a1c317a8bb39fd4
This dates from when libutils was still part of frameworks, and talks
about stuff that *didn't* move out of frameworks.
Test: treehugger
Change-Id: Icf22eebc417bcb37abdbfdc89e9a3f14894e18c2
Allow LightRefBase to be used with
ANDROID_UTILS_REF_BASE_DISABLE_IMPLICIT_CONSTRUCTION, mainly for
libhwui.
Bug: N/A
Test: libutils_test
Change-Id: I251c874a80f0a069572bc51da45f8f8e74ba6f5b
This test previously expected failure - a machine which does not have
2GiB of memory. However, while today is becoming the past,
2GiB allocations working is no longer a dream of the future!
Fixes: 186569165
Test: libutils_test
Change-Id: I6a9ed608c0989d415b4e7735b8a451b8928b4083
Make it easier to see reference to usage documentation, as requested in
review.
Bug: 184190315
Test: libutils_test
Change-Id: If9056e35b1c7a779dd78f2b986ad10d02f25eaf3
Actually, it looks like it's only toLower() that's used, so let's remove
toUpper() separately, since it's so easy.
Test: treehugger
Change-Id: I8fae9fa513b2a34d5bd6b3f64e9305a1ee3c1ec4
I want to remove these bad ASCII-only APIs completely, but it might be
easier to remove the range variants first.
Test: treehugger
Change-Id: I4c11f959a7bd8e670708cc03281ea72e9c461ff7
If you need to do a case transformation for a Unicode string, you need
to use icu4c. This only worked for ASCII, which is just silly. Luckily
it doesn't seem to be used anywhere.
Test: treehugger
Change-Id: I4a864823ec35a0b57b50909587cc3efac3f531a7
Merged-In: I4a864823ec35a0b57b50909587cc3efac3f531a7
(cherry picked from commit c74d97c854)
This API was tested before, but it wasn't used until it is needed in
libbinder. Previously it passed the tests because wp::operator==
compares weak_ptrs which are never deleted, but it doesn't check the
value of m_ptr as well. This assumes that the RefBase implementation is
self-consistent.
Future considerations:
- add additional CHECK (perf?)
- add an additional optional CHECK?
- update all refbase tests to use an embellished form of this operator
Bug: 184190315
Test: libutils_test, boot and kill process when libbinder is using this
API
Change-Id: I66c97386d769529d5efae48e06775d4b4a344025
If you need to do a case transformation for a Unicode string, you need
to use icu4c. This only worked for ASCII, which is just silly. Luckily
it doesn't seem to be used anywhere.
Test: treehugger
Change-Id: I4a864823ec35a0b57b50909587cc3efac3f531a7
Merged-In: I4a864823ec35a0b57b50909587cc3efac3f531a7
Previously, sp::sp(T*) internally had a static cast, and people
frequently wrote code like this:
sp<A> a = ...;
sp<B> b(a.get()); // implicit static cast
Luckily, none of the other sp constructors have this implicit cast. So,
for explicit code, rather than making those use static_cast internally,
adding an sp::cast function.
Bug: 184190315
Test: use in libbinder
Change-Id: Id205c88d03e16cf85ccb8f493ce88b4bbc65a688
In form, inspired by ANDROID_BASE_UNIQUE_FD_DISABLE_IMPLICIT_CONVERSION.
We get occasional bugs about sp double-ownership. When this flag is
enabled, we have:
- you must construct RefBase objects using sp<>::make
- you must construct wp<> objects by converting them to sp<>
- if you want to convert a raw pointer to an sp<> object (this is
possible since the refcount is used internally, and is used commonly
on this*), then you must use 'assertStrongRefExists' semantics which
aborts if there is no strong ref held. That is, if a client uses
std::make_shared and then calls a function which internally used to
call `sp<T>(this)`, you would now call
`sp<T>::assertStrongRefExists(this)`, and the double ownership
problem would become a runtime error.
Bug: 184190315
Test: libutils_test
Change-Id: Ie18d3146420df1808e3733027070ec234dda4e9d
